Understanding how you are heard and finding your authentic voice

There are unresolved questions about what climate change communication is trying to achieve and who should be doing it, and as a result there is a huge amount of room for dispute, disagreement and contestation.

Is the purpose of climate change communication to:

  • provide clearer presentation of the science of climate change?
  • build public engagement (attitudes, behaviours) with climate change as a societal risk?
  • give policy makers the information they need in order to make good decisions?

There is a growing expectation for scientists to communicate their research findings to the public.

This can be a concern for some climate scientists because the science has often quite explicit policy implications.

As a result the line between climate communication and advocacy can appear blurred.

 

In order to be effective communicators scientists need to reflect on what role they are comfortable with3:

Barbara Govin (2017)
Barbara Govin (2017)
  • Pure scientist - someone who sits apart from society and just does their research. In reality, grant applications and funding comes with expectations of impact and relevance. In the end, no scientist can sit apart from the society of which they are a part of.

 

  • Science arbiter - deciding what scientific information decision-makers need in order to be effective. Scientists may find themselves in this role when politicians have to make a decision which can, at least in part, be answered by scientific evidence.

 

  • Issue Advocate - pushing for a particular (set of) policy response(s). Alternative options are ignored or dismissed.

 

  • Honest broker - provide all the options supported by the science, for others to decide how to use that information.
'Pure scientist' - Albert Einstein
'Pure scientist' - Albert Einstein
'Issue advocate' - James Hansen
'Issue advocate' - James Hansen
'Honest Broker' - Dr Tamsin Edwards
'Honest Broker' - Dr Tamsin Edwards

Working out what role is right for you

Exercise:

Read Roger Pielke Jr’s blog post on the different science communicator roles.

Discuss with a colleague the extent to which you identify with any of these roles.

Thinking back to the different audiences, which roles do you think are most suitable for each audience?

Which of these roles are you most comfortable with?

Are there times when you have had to take on one of these roles, and if so, what did you do in order to fulfill the requirements of that role?

The content of these webpages draws on a series of workshops created and developed by Climate Outreach and the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research as part of the Helix project.

3 Pielke Jr, R. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press.

 

Image credits:

Illustration by Barbara Govin created during the workshop held in Paris in September 2017

'Pure scientist' -  Albert Einstein. Unknown - Official 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics photograph

'Issue advocate' - James Hansen (advocate for nuclear power). NASA 2005 CC

'Honest broker' - Dr Tamsin Edwards, Kings College, London