How people think and feel
People in Britain are concerned about climate change and are taking action to protect the environment
As explored in chapter 2, 74% say climate change is an important issue. People feel sad and concerned about the impact we are having on the environment and the natural world.
“I think the climate has definitely changed all around the world… One week we get absolutely scorching hot weather. I remember one week with scorching hot weather and then the following week we had snow… The pollution and everything that's going on through the environment has obviously had a big impact on it.”
Dissenting Disruptor, Aberdeen North
“...The point is the legacy of the planet is in real danger and no one appears to be taking it seriously. So yeah, it is very concerning.”
Sceptical Scroller, Glasgow Central Constituencies
“...we just have to look at the facts. The polar caps are melting, the temperatures are rising… and more people around the world will be suffering. It is happening and it's happening now in real time…”
Progressive Activist, Brighton
More than a third (35%) say they’ve been doing more to protect the environment over the past year while 61% say they’ve been doing about the same as in previous years.
“...So at the moment myself and my neighbours are campaigning regarding a green space near us that's threatened to be built on. And so we've kind of formed an action group and are lobbying to try and get this green safe…”
Established Liberal, Goldalming
“I think I definitely try to be more sustainable. I think now that it's more in the media and it's definitely in the workplace. I mean the laws are changing around it, so it is something that I do think about in my home life as well.”
Dissenting Disruptor, Merthyr Tydfil
When asked about the world’s dependence on fossil fuels like oil and gas, most people express concern. Only 5% stated feeling positively about this.
Word cloud of open-text responses to the question ‘In a word or two, how do you feel when you think about the world’s dependence on fossil fuels like oil and gas’? (Source: More in Common and Climate Outreach, June 2025)
The way action on climate change is framed makes a huge difference to how much people support it
There is a high level of awareness and concern around these issues. And while support for action is fairly high, framing and messaging alters the extent to which people support it.
“I think they [the government] sometimes blind people with science. I think the terminology that they use is stuff that sometimes you can't necessarily check on... And sometimes I think it just seems to be something that they've plucked from air and then the following month they might say something that completely contradicts what they said the previous month…”
Rooted Patriot, Anglesey
"...it's all kind of buzzwords about making England cleaner and more clean energy…It's just how much work is actually being put into making that a reality”
Incrementalist Left, Basingstoke
Across this research we saw big differences in how people responded to similar but differently-worded questions.
Responses to different messaging and language used to talk about taking action on climate change (Source: More in Common and Climate Outreach, July 2025)
| Messaging and language | Response |
|---|---|
“To what extent would you support or oppose a campaign group calling for reaching net zero?” |
43% supports this 36% neither supports nor opposes 21% opposes |
“To what extent would you support or oppose a campaign group calling for balancing our carbon emissions by removing the same amount from the atmosphere?” |
46% supports this 42% neither supports nor opposes 11% opposes |
“To what extent would you support or oppose a campaign group calling for tackling climate change?” |
48% supports this 35% neither supports nor opposes 16% opposes |
“To what extent would you support or oppose a campaign group calling for protecting our environment?” |
59% supports this 31% neither supports nor opposes 10% opposes |
All segments are responsive to framing: there isn’t a group or type of person that is so sold on the need for urgent action that they are unaffected by language.
Even Progressive Activists – the segment that is most concerned about climate change – find statements more compelling when they’re not expressed in climate sector jargon.
For example, 63% of Progressive Activists find the following statement compelling: “When thinking about moving away from fossil fuels and relying more and more on clean energy, we need to prioritise a just transition”.
Whereas, 79% of Progressive Activists find this similar, but differently worded, statement compelling: “When thinking about moving away from fossil fuels and relying more and more on clean energy, we need to prioritise a more prosperous society and building a better future for everyone.”
People who are less well off care as much as people who are better off
It’s a mistake to assume that people with less money are less worried about climate change. People who say they often struggle to make ends meet are just as worried about climate change as the rest of Britain.
That said, people who are financially well off are 12% more likely than average to think about climate change a lot.
A majority try not to think about climate change too much, for a range of reasons
23% of Brits say they are ‘very worried about climate change.’ We asked the remaining 77% what stops them being more worried about it. These were the top 5 reasons:
- they have more immediate concerns to worry about (34%)
- they try not to worry about things generally (24%)
- they think we can adapt to any changes (22%)
- they think ‘humanity has overcome big threats before and I think we can overcome this one’ (17%)
- they think the risks of climate change are exaggerated (14%)
Only 4% said they don’t think climate change is real.
25% of Brits say they ‘think about climate change a lot.’ We asked the 75% who said ‘they don’t think about it much’ why they don’t think about it more. These were the top 5 reasons:
- it doesn’t typically come up as a topic in their day-to-day life (40%)
- there’s nothing they can do about it anyway (24%)
- It’s too depressing (18%)
- there’s nothing the government will do about it anyway (15%)
- It’s too complicated (15%)
Understanding the reasons people deliberately distance themselves from climate change means we can better communicate and engage.
People are very worried about climate change harming nature and wildlife
We asked people which climate change impacts they are most worried about over the next 10 years. The highest by some margin is ‘harm to nature and wildlife’ with 41% selecting this as one of their top three worries. This is the case for most segments. For Traditional Conservatives and Dissenting Disruptors, it is a close second.
Top five worries about potential negative impacts of climate change by segment (Source: More in Common and Climate Outreach, June 2025)
“I'm concerned about the sewage into the rivers and the seas and then also the heating up of the planet, the global warming, as it were.”
Rooted Patriot, Anglesey
The vast majority appreciate and respect nature
The vast majority feel strongly or somewhat appreciative and respectful of nature. 81% strongly or somewhat agree that ‘Being in nature makes me very happy.’ A smaller majority of us feel that we’re ‘part of nature.’
People who live in rural areas feel the most connected to nature. People in Wales feel more connected to nature than those in England and Scotland. The Sceptical Scroller segment is consistently the least connected to nature.
Nature is unifying
The proportion of people who say they ‘always treat nature with respect’ is high across segments, ages and income levels. Traditional Conservatives strongly identify with the need to respect our environment, and use this language when they talk about these issues.
“Respecting people, respecting things, respecting the planet and don't do things unnecessarily that can damage things [what being environmentally friendly means to them]...”
Traditional Conservative, Norfolk
“...I try and do the best I can… I don't litter… I will take my litter home. I won't just toss it out the car. And I've always done that because that's how I was brought up and it was about respect. Respect for other people, respect for yourself, hence respect for the planet and the environment that you live in.”
Traditional Conservative, Oxfordshire
While 42% of Traditional Conservatives say they would oppose a campaign group calling for reaching net zero, only 16% say they would oppose a campaign group calling for protecting our environment.
People recognise that we depend on the natural world
“If we damage the natural world, we damage ourselves, because every breath of air and every mouthful of food and water comes from nature” – 83% find this message convincing and relevant, and 75% find it interesting.
This was among the most effective messages we explored in this research. It was convincing across segments and demographics, and exceptionally so for younger people, with 87% of 25-34 year olds saying it’s convincing. Even the most sceptical of this framing, those in Wales, still find it overwhelmingly relevant (75%).
In our focus groups David Attenborough was brought up a lot. He’s consistently seen as a beacon of British expertise, passion, empathy and leadership in stewarding our relationship with nature.
..find the following message relevant and convincing: "If we damage the natural world, we damage ourselves, because every breath of air and every mouthful of food and water comes from nature"
"David Attenborough is a good example. He's been telling us for decades and decades. I mean he is a hundred years old now. He's travelled the world, he's seen the changes. He's a sir. You would think that people who knighted him respect him enough, but they're still not listening to the likes of him…"
Traditional Conservative, Oxford
"I think there are a lot more programmes as well that highlight the effects of global warming like David Attenborough, like Clarkson's Farm, even just seeing how the farmers are affected by global warming. There's a lot more out there now in the most recent years."
Dissenting Disruptor, Dartford
“...someone I look up to, maybe someone like David Attenborough, he seems to be a good person. He does a lot of good for social causes and the environment, so maybe someone like that.”
Incrementalist Left, Basingstoke
“...I think David Attenborough genuinely cares about the planet. That certainly seems to come across and like you say, he's very knowledgeable…”
Rooted Patriot, Anglesey
People are very proud of the UK's work to protect and restore natural places
People are more proud of tree planting, national parks and reducing litter than other pro-environmental actions we presented.
People feel a high degree of pride in those tangible examples of our national efforts. Things which they see and experience themselves are valued and cherished. Many are also proud of efforts that are often seen as divisive like new wind and solar farms. This contrasts with what feel like more abstract concepts like net zero or international leadership on climate change.
“I agree with delight in that because what I'm also seeing is where the local authority are not doing what they should, there's actually local community groups that are coming together, like a neighbourhood litter picking team… That's down to local folk taking pride in the area they live in”
Dissenting Disruptor, Merthyr Tydfil
People’s top priorities for climate change policy are protecting food and farming, supporting wildlife and reducing emissions
Looking at the most popular responses when people are asked to select their top three (of a possible 16) priorities for government policies to respond to climate change, people believe policies should:
- protect our food supply and support British farmers – 37%
- support wildlife – 27%
- be affordable or cost-saving for the least well off – 22%
- encourage other countries to lower their emissions – 22%
- prioritise lowering emissions as fast as possible – 21%
Importantly, the least popular option was “they should stop us all having to change our lifestyle too much”, with only 8% selecting this. This reflects the fact that people are happy to play their part, as long as they feel that it’s affordable and part of a broader endeavour.
People support both "mitigation" and “adaptation” but they don’t use or understand those terms
Most people don’t have a detailed grasp of what’s mitigation and what’s adaptation, or what these terms mean. They see bits of both under the broad banner ‘tackling climate change’ and ‘taking climate change seriously.’ They tend to support doing both, as long as they’re explained and brought to life.
Responses to different messaging and language used to talk about climate adaptation (Source: More in Common and Climate Outreach, June & July 2025)
| Messaging and language | Response |
|---|---|
Presenting technical terms: “Climate adaptation” |
41% think this is a good thing 51% are clear what this means |
Adding a basic explanation: “To what extent would you support or oppose the government investing in climate change adaptation measures?” |
58% support this |
Giving a vision of better: “the government needs to take climate change seriously – that means focusing on preparing us for the worst impacts of climate change, such as by building better flood defences and making our homes more suited for the heat” |
75% agree with this |
Please note, these three pieces of messaging were all presented in different questions in our research, and the second and third were part of split sample questions with 4 or 5 other message tests. Here we are presenting the data from across different questions to indicate where building on certain language shifts responses among participants to ‘climate adaptation’.
Strategic implications
Climate concern is more normal and enduring than many realise, but it takes different forms
Climate concern has endured, not dissolved, over recent years. But it hasn’t made us into a nation of climate activists or experts with a detailed grasp of complex concepts and terms. Instead, there is a strong but often quiet sense that climate change matters, and it requires strong leadership.
Instead of reinforcing the idea that caring about the climate looks a certain way, we need to normalise the different ways we are all grappling with it. We’re worried but we try not to think about it too much, and that’s ok. We are a nation of nature lovers and we want to play our part in protecting our world for our children and grandchildren. But we also struggle to see a clear path forward, or put climate ahead of our very real day to day worries, and that’s also ok.
Bringing climate and nature together increases support for action
While campaigners and experts often separate climate change from nature, people see them as part and parcel of the same thing: our responsibility to protect our environment, now and for the future. This more holistic perspective is far more inclusive and less polarising.
We need to continually draw out the connection: show how tackling climate change is protecting nature, and how protecting nature helps to address climate change.
Progress and possibility galvanise support
Most people don’t realise we’re already reducing our emissions. When we show them, we spark a sense of agency, possibility and a desire for further progress.
Instead of trying to make more people more worried about climate change, we need to show that it’s possible and desirable to tackle it. That progress is underway, and positive change is possible.
People especially need examples of tangible local action that they can experience and feel the benefits of, like solar panels and better public transport, rather than assuming data and stats will move people.
BTC 2025 Insights Report
NEXT